CAVI Footnotes: {1} for Κλειταγορα. Cf. Threatte (1980), 190ff.
CAVI Comments: The inscription after ARV[2]. - Beazley lists Labotos with a question mark;
LGPN ii lists the name as Λαβωτος (only here). Λαβωτας is the Doric form of
Λεωβωτης (see Pape); the latter accused Themistocles in 471 (see PA 9071). I do
not understand the ending -ος (miswritten?). I wonder if Κλιταγορα should not be
read as a masculine dative: Λαβοτ(α)ς καλος Κλιταγορα[ι], sc. δοκει. But
Kleitagora also appears as a feminine name (Acr. ii, 1445), once with καλη
(Mississippi, University, ex Robinson). Hence the name could be a kale-name,
without the adjective (cf. LGPN ii). Both Labot(a)s and Kleitagora(s) seem to
have Spartan connections; see Pape. - It is not clear to me, whether Beazley
thinks Κλιταγορα is a fem. or a masculine name; he cites the vase together with
other names in -αγορα[ς].
CAVI Number: 3080
AVI Bibliography: Bonaparte (1829), 34/1414 (inscription) and 137/1515 (vase). — Beazley
(1950), 317 (not ill.). — ARV[2] (1963), 1591.
CAVI / AVI Data from Henry Immerwahr's Corpus of Attic Vase Inscriptions (CAVI), updated by Rudoph Wachter's Attic Vase Inscriptions (AVI)
